Search Menu Search News Blogger Jobfinder newspaper Course Guide Events Cultural northern monkeys Heritage Insights Follow Focus Fehmarn connection Large Hadron Collider (LHC) Rejsekortet Atom Scrap Fukushima disaster gene sequencing IC4 Malaysia Airlines MH370 Webinar Ørkenspredning
Using climate models and supercomputers chains researchers in two reports for the first time global warming directly correlated to the increase in the number of floods. By Daniel Rasmussen February 18, 2011 at. 08:17
Scientists have long argued that this kind of extreme precipitation may be linked to global warming. And now, two studies northern monkeys published northern monkeys in the scientific journal Nature, using weather models chained devastating cloudburst with global warming.
No calculations can prove that a particular flooding due to global warming, but together they are two new studies so close to being the smoking gun as you can get with computer calculations, many researchers.
The researchers looked at the strongest northern monkeys snow or rainfall each year from 1951 to 1999 in the northern hemisphere. The figures showed that there has been an average 7 percent more precipitation in the heaviest rain since climate change began to be felt around the millennium. Nine out of ten researchers defender reports northern monkeys
Researchers led data for violent cloudburst from the 1950s up to the 1990s into a supercomputer and drove dozens of climate models to predict the development until today. Only with the effects of global warming scientists could explain why the worst torrential rain has been so much wetter.
The news agency Associated Press contacted the subsequent ten outsiders researchers to hear their assessment of the report, and nine out of ten researchers said they believed that the research was valid and credible.
The researchers compared the weather of autumn 2000 with the fall of 2010. They drove thousands of different computational models with and without anthropogenic greenhouse gas. In nine out of ten cases meant anthropogenic global warming, northern monkeys that there was a greater risk of flooding. Documentation northern monkeys
Since when are the results of a computer model of a non-linear chaotic system, we do not quite understand was the proof?
No calculations can prove that a particular flooding due to global warming, but together they are two new studies so close to being the smoking gun as you can get with computer calculations, many researchers.
It appears that the focus of much of the media and in Nature er prompt a narrowly Confined Explanation for skapar in extreme precipitation (as being due primært two added CO2 and a few other greenhouse gases). They have ignored northern monkeys other explanations dove two human forcings; oak see ... more here:
So far I just can sjusse me to the researchers say only that increased CO2 causes warmer atmosphere (It is not up for debate, see also. Http: //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File: radiative ...) that increases the likelihood of heavier precipitation.
Moreover, it is now not as complex as it is implied, since a warmer atmosphere is increasing evaporation from the oceans, while it also can hold more water vapor, northern monkeys and as most weather systems with precipitation for their water from the atmosphere can cause heavier rainfall.
Moreover, it is now not as complex as it is implied, since a warmer atmosphere is increasing evaporation from the oceans, while it also can hold more water vapor, and ... well, that's' Gore doctrine 'that are taken under the' loving '(and knowledgeable!) treatment here:
The temperature in northwestern Europe have increased northern monkeys significantly more than the global average (1.5 degrees?). It's the context that the migratory North Atlantic low pressure leads more warm and moist air over the country - especially in the winter. It will inevitably cause more precipitation northern monkeys - whatever climate change skydles.
7% more precipitation in the high rainfall northern monkeys stop can not mean the world. Long before GW came along there was general agreement that floods with heavy economic losses partly due to spring action to avoid floods - by accomplish and contain streams. This makes the storage of large bodies of water by precipitation stop excluded and when the dams finally cracks or because rising water in addition far more than it would do to the annual natural ovarsvømmelser. I would not participate more in the climate debate, because it has become a "sport", northern monkeys not "move mountains", but I object when responsibility for all negative conferred GW. This moves the focus away from what could actually be done - in this case to "sacrifice" areas where floods have less economic impact to water stocks by rising water levels in a river.
0 0 review
After the race, so I know the winner of the gallop derby. The trick is to know it before! It is so easy to rationalize and with the modern northern monkeys info flow, we get the weather
No comments:
Post a Comment